This is a serious landing: Denis Dvornikov

Denis Dvornikov, member of Russian Association of International Law, PhD in Legal Sciences, is in Artsakh these days, following Constitutional referendum processes. 168.am interviewed Denis Dvornikov on his observation mission and possible escalation of Azerbaijani aggression.

Mr. Dvornikov, in your opinion how the referendum was held in Artsakh and how new Constitution will have an effect on democracy processes in the country?

The referendum was really held on a high level. We should accept that the level of transparency and trustworthiness of expression not only compared with eastern neighbors, but also of “western”, i.e. Armenia, is really high. The fact of holding a referendum and adoption of updated Mother Law edifies that Constitution of Artsakh is a living organism, that it really strengthens state’s legal system. Simply said they correct and improve only what they use. From the perspective of USSR legal techniques, there was a perfect, steadfast Constitution, however, often it was one declaration.

International observers were following the referendum process, including from European countries, who expressed an opinion that the referendum complies with European criteria. How will it be reflected in Artsakh’s image and practically what will it give to an unrecognized state?

Any election and any referendum held in Artsakh is a manifestation. This explains both high participation (more than 76%) and support to the new Constitution (more than 87%). Referendum results may be not recognized, however, it’s impossible not to recognize people, who came to the polling stations. Artsakh’s image is firmly strengthening. More than 100 observers from 30 countries came to the Republic. This is a serious landing.

Artsakh continues living under the conditions of daily shootings. Analysts consider that in the upcoming months the Azerbaijani side may undertake another military attack, in all likelihood, it’ll occur in April. Do you consider this probable?

Everything depends on Azerbaijan’s internal condition. It’s known that the so-called “Karabakh issue” is a means to divert Azerbaijanis from economic and social issues. Oil trough is being failed, and mid-clan struggle is increasing. All this, of course, causes concerns. However, the situation is obvious for the MG Co-Chairs and mediators as well. I consider they’ll find correct words for Azerbaijani authorities to keep them from implementing fatal mistakes.

Is it possible that Azerbaijan initiates new escalation ahead of upcoming parliamentary elections to be held in Armenia in April?

Baku attentively follows the processes and I hope the conflict of pre-election coalitions and general heating of political passions won’t divide the Armenian society again. Civil struggle may become a sign of escalation. That’s why I want to hope that upcoming elections will be properly held. That each candidate will think that he/she, first and foremost, is a citizen of that country, and only then—a political figure. If the society remains consolidated, no one will dare to attack. The April lesson was rather sensitive.

By Gayane Khachatryan