“Yerevan is neither Beirut nor Aleppo. Let no one aspire to import Near East solutions of the previous century, of the Cold War to Armenia. Let those who don’t comprehend this need to look at the history of Lebanon’s civil war or at the consequences of the civil war going on the moment in Syria and draw conclusions.”
“Use of the term ‘decolonization’ was interesting to me, and unfortunately, use of this term is proper. Not a single post-Soviet country, even countries regarded as Russia’s vassals, appeared in such dependency from Russia. For instance, Belarus and its position in Russia-Ukraine conflict. Armenia’s authorities have totally failed Armenia’s foreign policy, not speaking of the domestic policy, economic policy dragged to a deadlock, that in half an hour Moscow solved the issue of failure of Armenia’s association with the EU. Armenia’s authorities have no other way out, than showing independence, sovereignty from Moscow, for instance, regarding deploying that very peacekeeping mission.”
“On August 1, 2016 the Investigation Department of the National Security Service has submitted a written request to the Armenian Prosecutor General’s Office to transfer the above-mentioned criminal case to another investigation body in accordance with the rules of the investigation set by the Article 190 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Armenia,” the NSS’s statement says.
The Human Rights Defender’s representatives are conducting visits to the Detention centers of the Police to see Varuzhan Avetisyan, Arayik Khandoyan, Artur Soghomonyan, Garnik Hovakimyan and other detainees, to get acquinated with the conditions of their detention, as well as to observe the provision of rights.
“The term ‘terrorist’ hasn’t been used for this period. Yet two days ago those operations weren’t even named terrorist corpus delicti, and it’s so, if the operations are directed against the population, civil persons. However, if NSS uses such a term, they have facts that those operations were directed not only against the authorities, the policemen, but against civil persons as well. Use of these terms shows that they intend to apply Article 217, maybe not towards all the members of the group.”
